Naming two (or more) executors can feel like a built-in check-and-balance system. In practice, it can turn routine administration into a coordination problem.
Co-executors typically share the same fiduciary responsibilities. That sounds symmetrical, but it has a hidden consequence: if the executors cannot act together, estate administration can stall.
And when action is delayed, the estate pays for it: more professional fees, more beneficiary suspicion, and sometimes real financial harm (missed opportunities, mounting expenses, and time-bar risks).
Below are four common problems that come up with co-executors, and practical ways to get the estate moving again: deadlocks, personal liability risk, increased cost from delay, and time-sensitive deadlines.
๐ This post is for paying subscribers only
Sign up now and upgrade your account to read the post and get access to all premium content that is only for paying subscribers.
๐ This post is for subscribers only
Sign up now to read the post. To get access to the full library of premium content, you must be a paying subscriber.
Already have an account ? Sign in
Hani Sarji
New York lawyer who cares about people, is fascinated by technology, and is writing his next book, Estate of Confusion: New York.
Related News
๐ NY: Resolving Disputes Between Co-Executors Over a Claim
Mar 13, 2025 — Premium
Driving the Estate: The Fiduciaryโs Journey in Matter of Pugach
Sep 04, 2024