Courts are often asked to evaluate testimony about what a decedent allegedly said before death. The reliability of such testimony has long been questioned.
This concern helps explain why the law often requires formalities for transfers of property, particularly transfers intended to take effect at death. Written instruments, signatures, witnesses, and delivery requirements serve evidentiary purposes: they provide more reliable proof of a transferor's intent than contested recollections of conversations.
π This post is for paying subscribers only
Sign up now and upgrade your account to read the post and get access to all premium content that is only for paying subscribers.
π This post is for subscribers only
Sign up now to read the post. To get access to the full library of premium content, you must be a paying subscriber.
Already have an account ? Sign in
- Estate Administration
- Dead Man's Statue
- Estate Litigation
- Litigation
- Evidence
- π Premium Content
- Testamentary Intent
- Wills: Formation
Hani Sarji
New York lawyer who cares about people, is fascinated by technology, and is writing his next book, Estate of Confusion: New York.
Related News
MCL 700.3101 Devolution of Estate at Death; Restrictions
Feb 28, 2026
Are In Terrorem Clauses Always Enforced in New York?
Feb 16, 2026
When Does an In Terrorem Clause Matter?
Feb 16, 2026