Lawyers write for many reasons: to explain doctrine, to clarify practice, to test ideas, and sometimes simply to think. Writing is often how legal understanding takes shape.
But there are moments when the right professional judgment is not how to publish — it is whether to publish at all.
This post explains why some legal analysis, even when accurate and carefully anonymized, is better left unpublished until a matter is fully resolved.
Accuracy Is Necessary, But Not Always Sufficient
Legal culture rightly prizes accuracy. We are trained to ask whether a proposition is doctrinally correct, supported by authority, and fairly stated.
Those questions are necessary. They are not always sufficient.
🔑 This post is for paying subscribers only
Sign up now and upgrade your account to read the post and get access to all premium content that is only for paying subscribers.
🔑 This post is for subscribers only
Sign up now to read the post. To get access to the full library of premium content, you must be a paying subscriber.
